[Screengrab via YouTube.]
Earlier this year, Sally Potter's 1992 film, Orlando (an adaptation of Virginia Woolf's book), was re-released. For the visually oriented, the film offers seriously sumptuous fare. One Elizabethan scene even includes a literal feast of flowers, and Oscar-winner Sandy Powell designed the costumes. Writing for Slate, Dan Kois notes that when Orlando came to the Sundance film festival in 1993, it probably appeared to be more Merchant Ivory than Sundance but, he asserts, Potter's interpretation -- her "mix of the ornate and the offhand" -- went on to pave the way for some of Wes Anderson's work as well as Sofia Coppola's playful Marie Antoinette.
[Screengrab via YouTube.]
First, Potter's color-coding. As a commentary on the Golden Age of Elizabeth I, all scenes that take place during the Elizabethan era are dominated by warm tones -- reds, yellows, coppers and golds. Later, when Orlando is living in the Victorian period, greens take over to signify new life ahead.
[Screengrab via YouTube.]
More from Emile:
"Hatfield House began as a royal palace, and Queen Elizabeth I spent her youth there. There is a tree in the park which is supposed to mark the spot where she received the news that she had become Queen following her sister Mary's death."
[Great Hall at Hatfield House]
[Image via Barnes & Noble.]
The Cecil (pronounced to rhyme with thistle) family of Hatfield goes back to William Cecil, a self-made man who rose to prominence under Queen Elizabeth I and became an indispensable minister in her court. Hatfield House was actually built by his son Robert, the 1st Earl of Salisbury, in the reign of James I, and it still has a strongly Jacobean appearance, including its picturesque silhouette.
[Grand Staircase at Hatfield House]
[Chinese Bedroom at Hatfield House]
In part two, we'll look at Blenheim Palace.
Related past post: Dramatic Color.









8 comments:
They are both glorious houses,as is the movie. my VHS is worn out, I will be getting this promptly. pgt
Gaye -- The DVD 'bonus features' are unconventional, which probably comes as no surprise! There is a long documentary style segment about the Russian locations almost used for filming as well as a segment on Uzbek locations. Only a smidge on the costumes. But I think it's right up your alley!
I am embarrassed to admit that I have never seen this film but you have certainly piqued my curiosity - and I will watch it that much more informed!! Fascinating!
Q --
I'll be interested to hear what you think. I just scratched the surface about a few visual components but the Slate story explains the movie well!
I feel honoroued to see my humble sentences appear in your blog!
Rereading that bit about the tree at Hatfield where Elizabeth heard that she was queen, it struck me how filmic that really is:
Red-haired princess and her ladies under tree doing ladylike things; group of horesemen appears in distance, ladies all aflutter; important-looking man dismounts, Elizabeth comes forward to face him with mixture of bashfulness and determination; man dofs hat and bows deeply saying 'Ma'am, the Queen is dead, you are the new Queen'; camera pulls back to show all bowing to Elizabeth, framed by tree.
Perhaps I have half-remembered this from one of the films about her, I am not sure, but the scene has great potential, doesn't it? :)
One of my favorite things to do when watching period dramas filmed on location at various houses is to spot how rooms from one house are mixed with rooms from another house as if they were part of the same! So, I love seeing this post (and reading Emile's insight on each house). Looking forward to part 2.
Emile -- I'm honored that you contributed! Again, thank you. And yes, I thought of the cinematic scene when you first mentioned 'Elizabeth's tree.' :)
Janet --
Fascinating point. Now that will always be on my mind!
Post a Comment